10 lagi SOALAN-soalan tentera Rusia menimbulkan ke Ukraine, Amerika Syarikat ke atas kemalangan MH17

Ketua Staf Jeneral Angkatan Tentera Leftenan Jeneral Andrey Kartopolov (kiri) dan Ketua Tentera Udara Kakitangan Utama Leftenan Jeneral Igor Makushev (kanan) pada sidang media di Moscow, 21 Julai (Head of General Staff of the Armed Forces Lt. Gen. Andrey Kartopolov ( left) and chief of the Air Force Main Staff Lt. Gen. Igor Makushev ( right) at a media conference in Moscow, July 21 (RIA Novosti/Vadim Savitsky)

bOLLy ENn - Rusia telah mengeluarkan data pengawasan tentera, yang menunjukkan Kiev jet tentera menjejaki pesawat MH17 sejurus sebelum kemalangan - dan menim-bulkan satu lagi set soalan-soalan untuk Ukraine dan Amerika Syarikat ke atas hal keadaan tragedi itu.

Pegawai tentera - Ketua Staf Jeneral Angkatan Tentera Leftenan Jeneral Andrey Kartopolov dan ketua Tentera Udara Kakitangan Utama Leftenan Jeneral Igor Makushev - diajukan beberapa soalan utk Kiev & Washington mengenai kemungkinan punca malapetaka di Timur Ukraine yang mengorbankan hampir 300 orang Khamis lepas.

1. Kenapa pesawat MH17 yang meninggalkan koridor antarabangsa?

"Sila ambil perhatian bahawa pesawat itu tinggal di dalam koridor tersebut sehingga ianya sampai ke Donetsk tetapi kemudian ia menyimpang dari laluan ke utara," kata Kartopolov.

2. Telah MH17 meninggalkan laluan kesilapan pelayaran atau adalah anak-anak kapal yang mengikut arahan oleh pengawal trafik udara Ukraine di Dnepropetrovsk?

"Sisihan maksimum dari sempadan kiri koridor adalah 14 km. Berikutan itu, kita dapat melihat pesawat manuver untuk kembali ke koridor, namun anak-anak kapal Malaysia tidak berpeluang untuk melengkapkan gerakan itu. Pada 17.20, pesawat itu mula kehilangan kelajuan, dan pada 17.23 ia hilang dari radar Rusia."

3. Mengapa kumpulan besar sistem pertahanan udara dikerahkan 

ke kawasan-yang dipegang militia jika ‘self-defense forces’ tidak mempunyai kapal terbang?

"Setakat yang kita tahu, tentera Ukraine mempunyai 3 atau 4 batalion pertahanan udara dilengkapi dengan sistem Buk-M1 SAM dikerahkan di sekitar Donetsk pada hari kemalangan itu. Sistem ini mampu mencecah sasaran dalam julat 35 km pada ketinggian sehingga 22 km."

10 more QUESTIONS Russian military pose to Ukraine, US over MH17 CRASH  . . .

Russia has released military monitoring data, which shows Kiev military jets tracking the MH17 plane shortly before the crash - and posed yet another set of questions to Ukraine and the US over the circumstances of the tragedy.

Military officials – chief of General Staff of the Armed Forces Lt. Gen. Andrey Kartopolov and chief of the Air Force Main Staff Lt. Gen. Igor Makushev - posed a number of questions to Kiev and Washington concerning the possible causes of the catastrophe in Eastern Ukraine that killed almost 300 people last Thursday.

1. Why did the MH17 plane leave the international corridor?

“Please note that the plane stayed within the corridor until it reached Donetsk but then it deviated from the route to the north,” said Kartopolov.

2. Was MH17 leaving the route a navigation mistake or was the crew following instructions by Ukrainian air traffic controllers in Dnepropetrovsk?

“The maximum deviation from the left border of the corridor was 14 km. Following that, we can see the plane maneuvering to return to the corridor, yet the Malaysian crew did not get a chance to complete the maneuver. At 17.20, the plane began to lose speed, and at 17.23 it disappeared from Russian radars.”

3. Why was a large group of air defense systems deployed to the militia-held area if the self-defense forces have no planes?

“As far as we know, the Ukrainian military had three or four air defense battalions equipped with Buk-M1 SAM systems deployed in the vicinity of Donetsk on the day of the crash. This system is capable of hitting targets within the range of 35 km at the altitude of up to 22 km.”

Unit pertahanan peluru berpandu Buk di Wilayah Donetsk, 5km utara bandar Donetsk, pada 14 Julai, 2014 (Buk missile defense units in Donetsk Region, 5km north of Donetsk city, on July 14, 2014 (RIA Novosti)

4 Mengapa Kiev menggunakan Buk sistem peluru berpandu 

sebelah kawasan militia terkawal ke depan tragedi itu?

"Kami mempunyai gambar-gambar satelit dari tempat di mana Ukraine mempunyai unit pertahanan udara yang dikerahkan di bahagian tenggara negara ini. Yang pertama 3 gambar telah dibuat pada 14 Julai yang pertama menunjukkan gambar pelancar Buk 8 km barat laut Lugansk.

Anda boleh melihat dengan jelas yang TELAR dan 2 TELs. Gambar kedua menunjukkan radar 5 km utara Donetsk. Anda boleh melihat 2 tar bersama-sama dengan peralatan lain dan struktur teknikal.

Gambar yang ke-3 menunjukkan sistem pertahanan udara utara Donetsk. Anda boleh melihat dengan jelas yang TELAR pelancar dan kira-kira 60 kenderaan tentera dan bantuan, khemah-khemah untuk kenderaan dan struktur lain.

"Berikut adalah gambar kawasan yang sama dibuat pada 17 Julai Sila ambil perhatian bahawa pelancar telah hilang. Gambar yang ke-5 menunjukkan bateri peluru berpandu Buk di Kampung Zaroshchenskoye 50 km timur Donetsk dan 8 km selatan Shakhtyorsk pada pagi hari yang sama. Gambar yang ke-6 menunjukkan kawasan yang sama pada 18 Julai Seperti yang anda lihat, telah meninggalkan bateri."

4. Why did Kiev deploy Buk missile system right next to the militia-controlled area straight ahead of the tragedy?

“We have satellite photos of the places where Ukraine had its air defense units deployed in the southeastern parts of the country. The first three photos were made on July 14. The first photo shows Buk launchers 8 km northwest of Lugansk. You can clearly see a TELAR and two TELs.

The second photo shows radars 5 km north of Donetsk. You can see two TARs along with other equipment and technical structures. The third photo shows air defense systems north of Donetsk.

You can clearly see a TELAR launcher and about 60 military and auxiliary vehicles, tents for vehicles and other structures.

“Here’s a photo of the same area made on July 17. Please note that the launcher has disappeared. The fifth photo shows a battery of Buk missiles at the village of Zaroshchenskoye 50 km east of Donetsk and 8 km south of Shakhtyorsk on the morning of the same day. The sixth photo shows the same area on July 18. As you can see, the battery has left.”

Tiada unit pertahanan Buk peluru berpandu di Donetsk Wilayah, 5km utara bandar Donetsk, pada Julai 17, 2014 (No Buk missile defense units in Donetsk Region, 5km north of Donetsk city, on July 17, 2014 (RIA Novosti)

5. Pada hari kemalangan Kiev meningkat aktiviti di radar 9S18 Kupol-M1, yang merupakan sebahagian daripada sistem Buk di kawasan tersebut. Mengapa?

"Juga, 17 Julai menyaksikan peningkatan aktiviti di pihak Kupol-M1 9S18 radar Ukraine, yang merupakan sebahagian daripada sistem Buk itu. Di sini pada carta ini anda melihat bahawa terdapat tujuh radar yang beroperasi pada 15 Julai, lapan radar yang beroperasi pada 16 Julai, dan 9 radar yang beroperasi pada 17 Julai di kawasan itu.

Kemudian, bermula dengan 18 Julai, keamatan aktiviti radar radikal menurun, dan kini terdapat tidak lebih daripada 2 atau 3 radar beroperasi sehari. Sebab di sebalik ini masih belum dijumpai."

6. Apa kah yang kapal terbang tentera melakukan di laluan 

yang dicadangkan untuk penerbangan awam?

"Terdapat 3 pesawat awam di kawasan itu melakukan penerbangan biasa mereka pada masa ini. Terdapat penerbangan dari Copenhagen ke Singapura pada 17:17, terdapat penerbangan dari Paris ke Taipei pada 17:24, dan kemudian terdapat penerbangan dari Amsterdam ke Kuala Lumpur."

"Selain itu, sistem pemantauan Rusia mencatatkan bahawa terdapat jet Tentera Udara Ukraine, mungkin kah Su-25, memanjat dan menghampiri Boeing Malaysia."

"Su-25 adalah 3 - 5 km dari kapal terbang Malaysia. Su-25 mampu mendaki ke ketinggian 10,000 meter untuk tempoh yang singkat. Persenjataan standard termasuk R60 udara-ke-udara peluru berpandu, yang mampu mengunci dan memukul sasaran daripada 12 km dan yang dijamin untuk memukul sasaran dari jarak 5 km."

5. On the day of the crash Kiev increased activity on its Kupol-M1 9S18 radars, which are components of the Buk system in the area. Why?

“Also, July 17 saw increased activity on the part of Ukraine’s Kupol-M1 9S18 radars, which are part of the Buk system. Here on this chart you see that there were seven radars operating on July 15, eight radars operating on July 16, and nine radars operating on July 17 in the area.

Then, starting with July 18, the intensity of radar activities radically decreased, and now there are no more than two or three radars operating a day. The reason behind this is yet to be found.”

6. What was a military plane doing on the route intended 

for civilian flights?

“There were three civilian planes in the area performing their regular flights at this time. There was a flight from Copenhagen to Singapore at 17:17, there was a flight from Paris to Taipei at 17:24, and then there was the flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.”

“Also, Russian monitoring systems registered that there was a Ukrainian Air Force jet, probably Su-25, climbing and approaching the Malaysian Boeing.”

“The Su-25 was 3-5 km away from the Malaysian plane. Su-25 is capable of climbing to the altitude of 10,000 meters for a short period of time. Its standard armament includes R60 air-to-air missiles, which are capable of locking and hitting targets from 12 km and which are guaranteed to hit the target from the distance of 5 km.”

(RIA Novosti/Vadim Savitsky)

7. Mengapa jet tentera terbang pada masa yang hampir sama 

dan ketinggian yang sama dengan pesawat penumpang?

"Pada 17: 21'35, dengan halaju [Boeing ini] telah menurun kepada 200 kilometer sejam, markah mengesan objek di udara muncul di tempat kemusnahan Boeing ini. Objek udara baru ini telah mengesan secara berterusan untuk jangka masa 4 minit oleh stesen radar Ust-Donetsk dan Buturinskaya.

Seorang pengawal trafik udara diminta ciri-ciri objek di udara yang baru, tetapi tidak mampu untuk mendapatkan apa-apa bacaan pada parameternya - kemungkinan besar kerana fakta bahawa pesawat baru itu tidak dilengkapi dengan transponder radar pengawasan menengah, yang merupakan ciri yang tersendiri pesawat tentera, "kata Makushev.

"Mengesan pesawat baru menjadi mungkin kerana ia mula naik. Perubahan seterusnya dalam koordinat objek di udara ini menunjukkan bahawa ia berada di atas laman Boeing 777 itu terhempas, pemantauan keadaan.

"Pegawai-pegawai Ukraine awal mendakwa bahawa tidak ada pesawat tentera Ukraine di kawasan kemalangan hari itu. Seperti yang anda lihat, ianya adalah tidak benar."

8. manakah pelancar - dari video yang disebarkan oleh media Barat dan menunjukkan sistem Buk dipindahkan didakwa dari Ukraine ke Rusia - datang? Video itu dibuat di wilayah yang dikuasai Kiev, di mana pelancar telah diangkut?

"Saya ingin mengatakan bahawa maklumat yang kami telah dibentangkan di sini adalah berdasarkan kepada objektif dan boleh dipercayai data dari pelbagai sistem teknikal - tidak seperti tuduhan-tuduhan tidak berasas yang dibuat terhadap Rusia," kata Kartopolov.

7. Why was the military jet flying at almost the same time and the same altitude with a passenger plane?

“At 17:21’35, with [the Boeing’s] velocity having dropped to 200 kilometers per hour, a new mark detecting an airborne object appears at the spot of the Boeing’s destruction. This new airborne object was continuously detected for the duration of four minutes by the radar stations Ust-Donetsk and Buturinskaya.

An air traffic controller requested the characteristics of the new airborne object, but was unable to get any readings on its parameters – most likely due to the fact that the new aircraft was not equipped with a secondary surveillance radar transponder, which is a distinctive feature of military aircraft,” said Makushev.

“Detecting the new aircraft became possible as it started to ascend. Further changes in the airborne object’s coordinates suggest that it was hovering above the Boeing 777’s crash site, monitoring of the situation.

“Ukrainian officials earlier claimed that there were no Ukrainian military aircraft in the area of the crash that day. As you can see, that is not true.”

8. Where did the launcher – from the video circulated by 

Western media and showing a Buk system being moved allegedly from Ukraine to Russia – come from? As the video was made on the territory controlled by Kiev, where was the launcher being transported?

“I’d like to say that the information we have presented here is based on objective and reliable data from various technical systems – unlike the groundless accusations made against Russia,” said Kartopolov.

"Sebagai contoh, media mengedarkan video kononnya menunjukkan sistem Buk dipin-dahkan dari Ukraine ke Rusia. Ini jelas fabrikasi.

Video ini dibuat di bandar Krasnoarmeisk, seperti yang dibuktikan oleh papan iklan yang anda lihat di latar belakang, mengiklankan jualan kereta pada 34 Dnepropetrovsk Street. Krasnoarmeysk telah dikawal oleh tentera Ukraine sejak 11 Mei"

“For example, media circulated a video supposedly showing a Buk system being moved from Ukraine to Russia. This is clearly a fabrication.

This video was made in the town of Krasnoarmeisk, as evidenced by the billboard you see in the background, advertising a car dealership at 34 Dnepropetrovsk Street. Krasnoarmeysk has been controlled by the Ukrainian military since May 11.”

9 Di manakah ia sekarang? Kenapa beberapa peluru berpandu hilang pada pelancar? Bilakah kali terakhir peluru berpandu telah dilancarkan daripadanya?

9. Where is it right now? Why are some of the missiles missing on the launcher? When was the last time a missile was launched from it?

Screenshot daripada video yang dipaparkan di Kementerian Ukraine akaun Negeri, menunjukkan sistem Buk kononnya dipindahkan dari Ukraine ke Rusia dengan 2 daripada 3 peluru berpandu (Screenshot from video posted on Ukraine’s Ministry of Interior account, showing a Buk system supposedly being moved from Ukraine to Russia with two out of three missiles).

10. Mengapa tidak pegawai Amerika Syarikat mendedahkan bukti yang menyokong dakwaan bahawa MH17 telah ditembak jatuh oleh peluru berpandu yang dilancarkan oleh militia?

"Pegawai Amerika Syarikat mendakwa mereka mempunyai gambar-gambar satelit membuktikan pesawat Malaysia telah ditembak jatuh oleh peluru berpandu yang dilancarkan oleh militia.

Tetapi tiada siapa yang melihat gambar-gambar ini setakat ini. Setakat yang kita tahu, memang merupakan satelit Amerika Syarikat terbang di atas tenggara Ukraine pada 17 Julai 17:06-17:21 masa Moscow.

"Satelit ini adalah sebahagian daripada sistem eksperimen yang direka untuk mengesan dan memantau pelancaran peluru berpandu pelbagai julat. Jika rakan-rakan Amerika kita mempunyai imej dari satelit ini, mereka harus melepaskannya untuk masyarakat antarabangsa untuk memeriksanya secara terperinci.

Ini mungkin satu kebetulan, tetapi satelit Amerika Syarikat terbang di atas Ukraine tepat pada masa yang sama apabila pesawat Malaysia terhempas."

10. Why haven’t US officials revealed the evidence supporting claims that the MH17 was shot down by a missile launched by the militia?

“US officials claim they have satellite photographs proving the Malaysian airliner was shot down by a missile launched by the militia. But no one has seen these photographs so far. As far as we know, there was indeed a US satellite flying over southeastern Ukraine on July 17 from 17:06 to 17:21 Moscow time.

“This satellite is part of an experimental system designed to track and monitor the launches of missiles of various ranges. If our US colleagues have imagery from this satellite, they should release it for the international community to examine it in detail. This may be a coincidence, but the US satellite flew over Ukraine at exactly the same time when the Malaysian airliner crashed.”

Buk unit peluru berpandu pertahanan di Zaroschinskoe, 50km selatan bandar Donetsk dan 8km selatan Shakhtyorsk, pada 17 Julai, 2014.Photo ihsan Kementerian Pertahanan Rusia (Buk missile defense units in Zaroschinskoe, 50km south of Donetsk city and 8km south of Shakhtyorsk, on July 17, 2014.Photo courtesy of the Russian Defense Ministry).

Ini bukan kali pertama Russia membawakan naik soalan-soalan ‘brings up questions’ mengenai kemalangan pesawat. Tiada penjelasan yang telah mengikuti dengan Kiev menegaskan mereka mempunyai bukti yang penuh dengan Rusia berada di belakang serangan itu, tetapi setakat ini hanya melepaskan pita ‘tapes’.

Amerika Syarikat, meletakkan kesalahan pada ‘self-defense forces’, masih belum enggan untuk melepaskan apa-apa bahan perisikan. Pada Jabatan Negara Isnin Timbalan Jurucakap Marie Harf diterangkan kenyataan Rusia sebagai "propaganda dan mak-lumat yang salah" - tetapi apabila wartawan bertanya sama ada Washington akan melepaskan data perisikan dan satelit mereka, Harf hanya menjawab "berkenaan." Setakat ini Amerika Syarikat telah menyokong kenyataan dengan media sosial dan "akal."

This is not the first time Russia brings up questions on the plane crash. No explanations have followed with Kiev insisting they have full evidence of Russia being behind the attack, but so far only releasing tapes.

The USA, putting the blame on the self-defense forces, has yet refused to release any intelligence material. On Monday State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf described Russia’s statements as “propaganda and misinformation” - but when reporters asked her whether Washington would be releasing their intelligence and satellite data, Harf only replied "may be." So far the US has been backing its statements by social media and "common sense."

READ MORE:  http://on.rt.com/bo85c1